Post by momofrussell on Jun 16, 2004 18:55:40 GMT -5
no need to take it off board, info on cataracts might be helpful to someone else here. We'll just move it to it's own thread! I enjoy your sense of humor... kind of demented like mine LOL Kicked off for being rowdy? The heck you say!
Thanks for the clarification. So you know a handful of children w/DS and congenital cataracts and plenty more children, "typical" for lack of a better term, that have cataracts also, through that group? Just so I understand.
Charlie was premature? But had his cataract removal surgery shortly after birth? I am glad at least Charlie has his implant in one eye... that is better than none in my book.
Russell had both removed shortly after birth also. He didn't get his lens implants until he was 4 1/2 and after we had moved from CA and left our WONDERFUL Ped Eye doc. It was a battle to say the least. We were refered to the first doc we met in St Louis and he didn't think Russell should have the surgery. I then called our old doc who said the same thing. See, with Russell, he has amblyopia (Does Charlie?), strabismus and the BIG kicker, a nasty case of Nystagmus. His left pupil was pulled up and elongated since birth until he was 2 1/2 so he had to have corrective surgery for that too. So, after our old doc assuring us that when Russell was around 4-5 yrs old she retracted saying it wouldn't do Russell a bit of good.
That was baffling. Didn't she think that Russell would develop better with "eyes" then without eyes and she said NO... she didn't think it would benefit him and the risks were greater. Our doc in St Louis agreed. I disagreed and was very mad that we were led to believe otherwise. Our first doc in STL had a preconcieved idea about it all, and bad bedside manner and an attitude to boot, so this mommy didn't take to kindly to all of that and I dismissed hiim after he performed and EUA while we were still in the hospital. He tried to dismiss me and go to my husband, but, heck, doesn't he know we stick together like glue? LOL
I then turned to another doc at the St Louis Children's Hosp (not where the first doc was at) to a doc who perfoms the lens implants quite often. The first doc was not known to do so which I learned later. So it was good the first doc didn't do the implants. Our new doc is WONDERFUL and DOES believe in the developement of our children (our meaning DS) and strongly believed the development of Russell far outweighed the risks. We agree and Russell now is psuedoaphakic. It took Russell a good year or more to realize his eyes were there and what they were for LOL.
He still has other eye issues, the amplyopia and nystagmus. And until Russell is a bit older AND can talk/communicate (Russell doens't talk and communication is the pulling of a hand) we will not know how bad the nystagmus is effecting his eyes. He squints to find his null point and doesn't use his left eye that much because of the pupil issues in the past. I know some people with Nystagmus function ok and others are considered legally blind. We just work with him at school so he can get the best possible until we know otherwise.
I am sorry to read that Charlie has glaucoma in his one eye. That was a big risk without the lenses for Russell. I will knock on wood with ya for Charlie.
Thanks for sharing all about Charlie. Other than Radonna who use to post here about her son Kaden, I have never met anyone who's child was born w/DS AND cataracts in both eyes So, nice to finally talk to another parent! I wish Radonna were still here! Even though her son was a bit older, they were two peas in a pod and we had a lot in common with our boys that we didn't with other parents sometimes.
So.. nice to finally meet ya!
A.
Thanks for the clarification. So you know a handful of children w/DS and congenital cataracts and plenty more children, "typical" for lack of a better term, that have cataracts also, through that group? Just so I understand.
Charlie was premature? But had his cataract removal surgery shortly after birth? I am glad at least Charlie has his implant in one eye... that is better than none in my book.
Russell had both removed shortly after birth also. He didn't get his lens implants until he was 4 1/2 and after we had moved from CA and left our WONDERFUL Ped Eye doc. It was a battle to say the least. We were refered to the first doc we met in St Louis and he didn't think Russell should have the surgery. I then called our old doc who said the same thing. See, with Russell, he has amblyopia (Does Charlie?), strabismus and the BIG kicker, a nasty case of Nystagmus. His left pupil was pulled up and elongated since birth until he was 2 1/2 so he had to have corrective surgery for that too. So, after our old doc assuring us that when Russell was around 4-5 yrs old she retracted saying it wouldn't do Russell a bit of good.
That was baffling. Didn't she think that Russell would develop better with "eyes" then without eyes and she said NO... she didn't think it would benefit him and the risks were greater. Our doc in St Louis agreed. I disagreed and was very mad that we were led to believe otherwise. Our first doc in STL had a preconcieved idea about it all, and bad bedside manner and an attitude to boot, so this mommy didn't take to kindly to all of that and I dismissed hiim after he performed and EUA while we were still in the hospital. He tried to dismiss me and go to my husband, but, heck, doesn't he know we stick together like glue? LOL
I then turned to another doc at the St Louis Children's Hosp (not where the first doc was at) to a doc who perfoms the lens implants quite often. The first doc was not known to do so which I learned later. So it was good the first doc didn't do the implants. Our new doc is WONDERFUL and DOES believe in the developement of our children (our meaning DS) and strongly believed the development of Russell far outweighed the risks. We agree and Russell now is psuedoaphakic. It took Russell a good year or more to realize his eyes were there and what they were for LOL.
He still has other eye issues, the amplyopia and nystagmus. And until Russell is a bit older AND can talk/communicate (Russell doens't talk and communication is the pulling of a hand) we will not know how bad the nystagmus is effecting his eyes. He squints to find his null point and doesn't use his left eye that much because of the pupil issues in the past. I know some people with Nystagmus function ok and others are considered legally blind. We just work with him at school so he can get the best possible until we know otherwise.
I am sorry to read that Charlie has glaucoma in his one eye. That was a big risk without the lenses for Russell. I will knock on wood with ya for Charlie.
Thanks for sharing all about Charlie. Other than Radonna who use to post here about her son Kaden, I have never met anyone who's child was born w/DS AND cataracts in both eyes So, nice to finally talk to another parent! I wish Radonna were still here! Even though her son was a bit older, they were two peas in a pod and we had a lot in common with our boys that we didn't with other parents sometimes.
So.. nice to finally meet ya!
A.