Post by laurasnowbird on Sept 10, 2006 14:02:41 GMT -5
Ughhhh! Ethan needs glasses, we think. He is closing one eye to see when he looks at things near his face. His local eye doctor tried twice to figure out his prescription, but those appointments ended badly, LOL!
So, we trekked off to the Kellogg Eye Center (THE place in Michigan, for those not from around here) and they did an excellent job of figuring out his prescription, but said that he is complicated. He has accomodative esotropia, but unlike most children with the condition who have fairly high prescriptions, (like +3.00, +4.00 and +5.00) Ethan has almost perfect vision. Blaaah, because they usually use glasses with the appropriate prescription to "fix" the eye turning inward. Their idea was to put him in glasses with almost no prescription on the top, but a fairly strong (for him, considering he has no prescription) bifocal on the bottom (+2.50).
So we get to join the ranks of those wearing glasses. I don't mind, I think they look REALLY cute on him, but it will probably be a struggle to get him to wear them.....so any and all advice is welcomed. I am concerned that he will quit using that eye altogether, and the brain will start ignoring it if we aren't successful in getting his eyes to work together. Anybody else experience this? BLAAAAH!
The good news was that he said 50% of kids with this condition will be corrected by using glasses, and not have to use them for life, and that those who are most successful are the ones with low prescription. He couldn't say how likely we were to have that outcome, because he hadn't had a child with DS with the almost non-existent prescription but eye turning in. Guess we get to be the guinea pig. There were a LOT of kids there with DS, though! It was a real treat to see all those cuties!!!
Anyway, his little glasses are supposed to be done by Tuesday or Wednesday. This should prove to be interesting!!!
I admire all of you who deal with more in-depth vision problems, cuz just this little thing has me freaking out. Like anything else that we deal with, after a couple of months this will just be part of the landscape, I'm sure, and I'll be wondering why I ever thought this little thing was a big deal.
So, we trekked off to the Kellogg Eye Center (THE place in Michigan, for those not from around here) and they did an excellent job of figuring out his prescription, but said that he is complicated. He has accomodative esotropia, but unlike most children with the condition who have fairly high prescriptions, (like +3.00, +4.00 and +5.00) Ethan has almost perfect vision. Blaaah, because they usually use glasses with the appropriate prescription to "fix" the eye turning inward. Their idea was to put him in glasses with almost no prescription on the top, but a fairly strong (for him, considering he has no prescription) bifocal on the bottom (+2.50).
So we get to join the ranks of those wearing glasses. I don't mind, I think they look REALLY cute on him, but it will probably be a struggle to get him to wear them.....so any and all advice is welcomed. I am concerned that he will quit using that eye altogether, and the brain will start ignoring it if we aren't successful in getting his eyes to work together. Anybody else experience this? BLAAAAH!
The good news was that he said 50% of kids with this condition will be corrected by using glasses, and not have to use them for life, and that those who are most successful are the ones with low prescription. He couldn't say how likely we were to have that outcome, because he hadn't had a child with DS with the almost non-existent prescription but eye turning in. Guess we get to be the guinea pig. There were a LOT of kids there with DS, though! It was a real treat to see all those cuties!!!
Anyway, his little glasses are supposed to be done by Tuesday or Wednesday. This should prove to be interesting!!!
I admire all of you who deal with more in-depth vision problems, cuz just this little thing has me freaking out. Like anything else that we deal with, after a couple of months this will just be part of the landscape, I'm sure, and I'll be wondering why I ever thought this little thing was a big deal.